Authors' Update - keeping journal authors in touch with industry developments, support and training

非常抱歉,我们不完全支持您的浏览器。如果您可以选择,请升级到较新版本或使用 Mozilla Firefox、Microsoft Edge、Google Chrome 或 Safari 14 或更高版本。如果您无法进行此操作且需要支持,请将您的反馈发送给我们。
2025年12月18日 | 4 分钟阅读
Tyrone Zhang

©istockphoto.com/Viktor Cvetkovic
Have you ever wondered how many journals an author typically has to submit to in order to get their research published? While not an exact science, it's safe to say that success on the first try is more of a goal than a reality. Multiple submissions, revisions and rejections are more common than you might think.
To better understand this aspect of the publication journey — and to show you there is light at the end of the tunnel — we’re exploring some of the behind-the-scenes work that goes on to find articles a good home. In this article, we examine the role our editors play in guiding authors through challenges and helping their work find the right journal.
Scientific Editor Angela Schena works across four Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) journals in biochemistry, biophysics and molecular and cellular biology. She is based in the United States and has been at Elsevier for thirteen years. She shares how her expertise, combined with our Article Transfer Service can turn challenges into opportunities for authors…
“No one likes to reject articles. And authors certainly do not like to be rejected! If an article is clearly not appropriate for the current journal, I want to help authors find better homes for their work. I prepare an initial list of possible journals within the ecosystem of journals which make up our article transfer system. Then, depending on the topic of the article and the nature of the work (descriptive or more experimental), I refine the list to land on two-three meaningful candidates. I find this to be a good number of suggestions, as you do not want to overwhelm authors with too many vague choices.”

Angela Schena
“In our portfolio, there are several journals to which a manuscript could be transferred. I am familiar with most of their aims and scopes. If I have doubts, ScienceDirect is the best place to refresh my memory! I am also in the somehow “privileged” position of working for four of the BBA journals and knowing all the others. This makes transfers within our BBA family of journals easier, since I can discuss articles with the other internal and external editors and make better-informed choices. Sometimes I am even able to guarantee peer review (not acceptance, of course!). We also work with other Elsevier Publishers to review transfer connections and establish new ones. This process is very data-driven and aims at improving our transfer offerings and helping authors get published faster.”
“I try to give clear reasons for each rejection, so that authors can make informed decisions on where to submit next. I often accompany the transfer offer with details about the suggested journals and answer their questions about the process and possible outcomes. If an article is transferred post-review, I might also offer advice on how to better revise the article before sending it to a more appropriate journal.”
“The classic approach to ATS is editor-driven. As such, authors know that editors make recommendations based on their knowledge of the topic and the field. That means authors know we are willing to give them another chance. Their work is publishable and has a higher chance of being accepted if transferred to the right journal. Moreover, the process is easy and minimizes the steps necessary to submit to another journal!
Authors love to save time on administrative tasks. Editors and reviewers also benefit from the editorial work and the pre-screening done in the feeder journal: transferred articles are in better shape and ready for peer review. This is especially true when an article is transferred post-review, since authors have the chance to improve their article according to the reviewers’ comments, before the transfer. In some cases, we are also able to enlist the original reviewers, therefore saving time and preserving the fairness of the peer review process. It is a win-win for everyone!”
“Editors and I work hard to deliver meaningful transfer offers. However, authors should of course still do their due diligence and familiarize themselves with the suggested journals, perhaps checking the aims and scope, format requirements, turnaround times, publishing model, and so on. This speeds up the process and increases the chances of being published in a journal appropriate to the needs of the author.”
There are many actors in the publishing environment, some whose roles are more visible than others. Angela and her colleagues work with authors to ensure that valuable research reaches the right audience. Thanks to the Article Transfer Service, they not only help authors navigate the complexities of the publication journey but also contribute to a more efficient and supportive scholarly ecosystem, driving better outcomes.
This is just one aspect of the collaborative relationship between authors and journals. As a follow-up, we’ll explore the author perspective on the journey from rejection to publication. So, stay tuned for the next article in this miniseries!

Marketing Communication Manager for Author Experience
